Call Today! 856-546-1350

South Jersey Law Blog

When Divorcing: A Deal is a Deal Even When it Involves Bernie Madoff

Posted by Richard DeMichele | Apr 04, 2012 | 0 Comments

Being swindled by Bernie Madoff is not enough to modify equitable distribution.

A New York Court of Appeals ruled that a divorced spouse is not entitled to revise his property settlement agreement even when the assets that he received from the marriage were accounts that were held with Bernie Madoff's investment firm.  You can read Peter Lattman's story in the New York Times by clicking here. This headline grabbing sensational story involving one of the greatest Ponzi schemes of all time is an important reminder that equitable distribution in New Jersey is not modifiable.  Said another way, “a deal is a deal”.  This trite saying was confirmed by the court in S chwartzman v. Schwartzman, It has long been held that “[s]ubsequent events which should have been in contemplation of the parties as possible contingencies when they entered into the contract will not excuse performance.” Of course, as with almost every other area of the law, there are exceptions to the rule.  There is a very limited exception to modify equitable distribution.  It is generally only available where a party can show “exceptional and compelling circumstances” where the enforcement of the agreement would be unjust, oppressive or inequitable.  The standard, by its very nature is designed to be difficult to meet and available in a very limited set of circumstances. While equitable distribution is generally not modifiable, child custody, child support, and parenting time is modifiable based on a current change of circumstances. Alimony is generally modifiable unless the property settlement agreement or judgment of divorce specifically provides that it is not modifiable.   This principle was further eloquently set forth in  Mahoney v. Mahoney decision. … it is settled law in New Jersey that, unlike an award of alimony or support, property division or equitable distribution provisions may not be adjusted after divorce to reflect unanticipated changes in the parties' circumstances, because the finality of a property division precludes any modification based on such changed circumstances.   If you have questions about any aspect of your current or past divorce contact the family law attorneys at DeMichele & DeMichele for a confidential consultation. You can reach us by phone at (856) 546-1350.

About the Author

Richard DeMichele

Richard A. DeMichele, Jr. is a seasoned litigator, devoting a substantial part of his practice to family law and personal injury matters.

Comments

There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Contact Us Today

DeMichele + DeMichele, P.C. is committed to answering your questions about Divorce, Custody & Parenting Time, Child Support, Alimony, Personal Injury, Municipal & Criminal Defense, and Real Estate law issues in New Jersey.

We’ll gladly discuss your case with you at your convenience. Contact us today to schedule an appointment.

Menu